Several weeks ago, something very important in the development of Fourth Generation war happened. On our own soil, the U.S. “military” had to be protected by civilian volunteer militiamen.
The protection of U.S. military recruiting offices by armed volunteer militiamen occurred in response to the Islamic attack on two recruiting centers in Chattanooga. The Defense Department soon asked the militiamen to cease and desist, which they did. The fact that a militia’s defense of the U.S. “military” lasted only briefly does not undo its significance. The sort of thing we are used to seeing in hollow states such as Lebanon happened here.
The militia’s action was not required, let me stress, because the soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines who man our recruiting stations are incapable of defending themselves. The can do so, and would be happy to do so (well, the men anyway). Accounts of the Islamic attack suggest many of the recruiters behaved bravely, risking and sometimes giving their lives to protect others. They could not defend themselves because they are not allowed to be armed.
Here is where the importence of this incident to the development of 4GW on American soil, something we should greatly fear, is to be found. The reason our military personnel are not allowed to be armed is two-fold. Both point to the essence of 4GW, the emptying out of the state of its content, at the moral level.
The first reason is that too many of our servicemen’s superiors, both generals and civilians (including their ultimate superiors, the politicians) are moral cowards. They live in terror that an incident could happen where they might be held responsible, endangering the thing they live for, personal career success. Armed servicemen might lead to–horrors!–shots being fired. Murphy’s Law dictates that if enough shots are fired (even though we are talking very few), a civilian might get hit. The press will howl, “Who is To Blame?”, crying women will be interviewed on television, and “successful” people may find themselves in an unwelcome spotlight. Better to leave our “military” disarmed. The casualties will only be little people who don’t count.
The second, and related, moral hollowing-out of the state we see demonstrated by not allowing our servicemen to carry weapons in the womanizing of the culture, concerning which I have written before. Women are genetically programmed, by evolution, to seek safety. Guns strike most of them as unsafe. The general or politicians who dared to say, ”
Courage, people. Freedom requires taking risks. Yes, there may be some shoot-outs as our military personnel protect themselves and others from 4GW attacks, and yes, civilians may get hit in the crossfire. That is part of the price we must pay for liberty,
would end his career. The general would be fired, and the courageous politicians would be defeated at the next election as the women’s vote went to his opponent, who would no doubt to promise to “keep women safe.”
There is yet another wrinkle, one that plays both to womanizing the culture and “leaders” who flee responsibility. If we arm our servicemen, does that include gang members or other servicemen with non-state primary loyalties? Both have already shot and killed other American servicemen. The answer, obviously, is no. Should people with likely non-state primary loyalties be allowed to join and serve in the U.S. military? Again, no.
Then rise the shrieks and howls of the cultural Marxists, screaming “discrimination!” The moral cowards among our “leaders” have been conditioned to crawl and grovel before any accusation of political incorrectness, while those womanizing the culture are part of the culturally Marxist coalition.
A state that wishes to survive in a 4GW world will learn to discriminate. Its military leaders will be chosen for their Verantwortungsfreudigkeit, joy in taking responsibility. Its political leaders will be men who put the good of the whole over the long term first and themselves a long way second. What is the chance America will do or have any of those things? The same as its chance of surviving as a state. 
How bizarre. William Lind has, for decades, told us of the almost near-total grasp cultural-marxism has on my country. To save themselves from the possibility of being voted out by the electorate, the the political elite have elected a new people by importing millions of poverty-stricken third-worlders from every vile hellhole on the planet. They have made war on western civilization, Christianity and, for lack of a better term, white people. There is no realistic possibility that these trends can or will be reversed (it could be worse, it has recently been released that whites will be a minority in Englandistan in only 10 years). Our govt, our education system, the infotainment complex and even erstwhile capitalist business sector are completely controlled by the cultural-marxist left.
And, yet, Mr. Lind tells us that the possibility of 4GW is bad and we must do everything possible to strengthen the state. What the hell for? Why should I give my all to prop up a state dedicated to the destruction of my civilization, my religion and my race? Instead, the goal should be to advance the cause of red state/county/township secession. A better option would be to hammer home to white soldiers, cops, govt workers, small businessmen (as well as those in the corporate world) and especially anyone who has skills and experience in television/film/radio that they are oppressed by the very entities they serve and to turn their loyalty toward something more enduring…more concrete that will return that loyalty.
Viva la revolution!
Admiral Ackbar!
“The first reason is that too many of our servicemen’s superiors, both generals and civilians (including their ultimate superiors, the politicians) are moral cowards.”
And right there, these “superiors” have lost the moral high ground.
VivaViva la revolution? Do you even know what it entails? Have you looked up the casualties of previous revolutions?
Even if a revolution were to happen, I want to see how many of you are willing to give up your daily comfort and conveniences to go out and be a revolutionary. It’s very easy to comment or tweet on your devices from the comfort of your home and it’s a whole another to be an activists.
Previous revolutions had legitimate reasons, what is your reason?
I think the Admiral laid out legitimate reasons. Revolution is terrifying, but so is the prospect of more America. The future belongs to those with strength to make things happen.
You want to see; yet cuck, cuck, cuck when actual reasons are spelled out? No matter, “America” died with the last assassinated President, no revolution required. When the bolsheviks come for us kulaks, self-defense in the face of the Red Terror, collapse and balkanization, is all that will be left; restructure of anything bigger than a local community must be left for our children’s children, God willing.
My point was revolution will not solve anything and a womanized society doesn’t have the capabilities to make it happen. People that fought the previous revolution had mental and physical audacity. Our society now comprises of feminists, obese, lazy,
homosexual people. So good Luck!
It take a lot more than few brave people to make things happen.
The reasons spelled out are obviously not good enough for a revolution. No one is waging war; the situation we are in now is because it was permitted. When a child doesn’t behave the way he is expected to behave, do you blame the child or his/her
parents? You can only blame the kid if the rules set by the parent were not followed; if there were no rules to be followed then the parent is at fault.
My governor ordered all the national guard recruiters to b armed, and nobody cares.
I’m n the Coast Guard Aux, (a fantastic organization btw) we are prohibited from carrying weapons. Some of us were shot at during Katrina as we were n boats rescuing people, if another hurricane happens again, I will change out of my uniform and cover my unit members with my rifle, operating as a civilian.
Actually, all it will take is the failure of the government transfer systems from producers to women, in any form. That means failures of the divorce and family court systems, the welfare state (state or federal), and any other forms of wealth transfer from productive men to women forced by the government.
This failure will likely be budgetary in nature, in that debt service will constrain governments from spending on social programs. Or, as popularly quoted, the revolution won’t occur until the EBT cards don’t work.
Wrong. The military did not require protection. The presence of a few sad, delusional people with guns did nothing useful and they were asked to leave.
I hope they can find something else to do. Perhaps the annual War on Christmas will distract them.
What
Sad and delusional? About what? About Muslims attacking recruiting offices? It seems that you are the one who is delusional.
i was at this location last week in Cleburne, TX they told the Pentagon to fuck off, they were not standing down. Basic premise failed on your part.
hahaha The USA empire is being Balkanized by third world scum. 100% deserved.
I love globalization.
buy cheap cialis online com reviews In a letter to the committee Andrew Scadding, the BBC s head of corporate affairs, said the corporation was willing to name the executives and managers who authorised the pay offs, but not the individuals